The regulatory landscape will continue to challenge uniform adoption of cross-border remote working. While international authorities like the EU and the OECD have initiated efforts to harmonize regulations for cross-border remote working, achieving a standardized approach to taxation and social security treatment of long-term remote working is likely to take time. In the meantime, local governments are taking varied approaches to categorization and treatment of
remote workers. Whilst we see certain governments use relaxations around remote working to attract visitors and increase access to digital talent, others have expressed concerns over erosion of their income tax base and focus instead on adopting legislation needed to govern domestic remote working arrangements. Open dialogue with the authorities, whether locally or at the OECD or EU level, will be increasingly more important to ensure that the voice of
international business is heard and considered as the legislative landscapes continue to evolve. This also means that organizations will need to continue to actively review and monitor the compliance risks inherent in their cross-border remote working programs.During times of crisis, such as when the world is going through a pandemic. Many companies get affected and need to change their way of working. Our purpose is to study how the abrupt
transition to remote work effects different
aspects of work and to see whether, and in what ways, the involuntary nature of the current remote work situation changes how remote work is perceived by employees and managers. We choose to do a qualitative study, in order to get a deeper understanding from both employees’ perspective and managers perspective. The managers and employees participating in our interview are from banking, insurance, and staffing agencies. These
interviews will be supplemented with secondary sources from news and statistical surveys. By comparing the results from our study with earlier research and recommendations from industry experts, we concluded that organizational members are handling the transition to remote work well despite the ongoing situation. Similar pros and cons of remote work that are present in previous research are also present in our interviews. However, there are some
distinct differences as well. Our thesis is intended to help other organizations learn and gain knowledge about how different organizations are managing remote work in a crisis and the challenges that it brings.Working from home extends far back in time. In the very beginning 1.9-1-4 million years ago, the first “working man” (Homo ergaster) did not move much from home to hunt (which was the way of working and bringing food to table during that time).
Many thousand years later from that
longhouses existed in England, where farmers lived and worked. Usually “working areas” in the longhouses were in the middle where one could find the kitchen, spinning, weaving, and dressmaking etc. So, the longhouses were where people lived and worked. During the middle ages, when tradespeople traded, much of the work were done from home. Even after the
industrial revolution when the working environment changed still there was some professions and works that were driven from home, such as funeral parlours, teaching from home etc. Even though the concept of working from home have existed for a very long time, companies officially began to give the opportunity of flexible working not before 1980. The organization IBM introduced then “remote terminals” in some workers homes, so that they could work in a
more flexible way. In 2009, 40 % of the employees at IBM were remote working from home which resulted in reduced working office/place which resulted in higher annual profit for the company (Dishman, As the social and technological environments and trends are changing, so does the way of working. Today workers at different organizations have more freedom and flexibility than ever to work from anywhere else than the “traditional” office. What
we mean with traditional office is an office
where people mainly work on their computers, but still are together in the same place. It is mainly about those working on the computer on their own, such as banking workers, insurance company workers and workers with different administrative responsibilities in the organization. What people want to achieve is a cheaper, faster, and greener way of working.
Remote work is one of the flexibilities and is (in this article) defined as “performing work at a location other than one’s primary office” (Jensen Perry et al., 2018). It is important to keep in mind that remote work not always have to be implemented because of a crisis like COVID-19, it can just be a “natural” way of working in some organizations, even in “normal” times, where
no external crisis forces them to do so. Further the article tells that different studies have strengthened the fact that people who have the flexibility to remote work are more satisfied which leads to fewer turnovers. When remote working, the workers often tend to work harder, and manage the long working hours better. Another important issue is the balance of work life
Conclusion
and private life. Studies shows that people who remote work experience less conflicts related to the work-family balance, even though it can be hard to ignore and not get affected of thing things or stressful situation at home that occur when you are “at work” (Jensen Perry et al., With this sudden increase of remote work on a global scale the questions of how to make remote work actually work, and how to effectively transition to remote work, are becoming
more and more popular. Both managers and workers are in an unprecedented situation which requires overarching change to the structure of the modern office and the idea of modern office work. Although the amount of people working remotely has been growing, most people still only work a few days per week from home and the rest in the office. Census numbers from the U.S. show that less than five percent of remote workers work full-time remotely
United States Census and according to Neeley companies in general are unprepared for this sudden change. It can be different from company to company what resources they need in order to manage the crisis and be able to remote work. According to Staples et al. there are four key drivers for an organization that needs to carry out the work in a virtual world. The


Comments
Post a Comment